Retroactive War Crime Protection Proposed

[Avery L. Breath]

Retroactive War Crime Protection Proposed
    By Pete Yost
    The Associated Press

    Wednesday 09 August 2006

    The Bush administration drafted amendments to the War Crimes Act that would retroactively protect policymakers from possible criminal charges for authorizing any humiliating and degrading treatment of detainees, according to lawyers who have seen the proposal.

    The move by the administration is the latest effort to deal with treatment of those taken into custody in the war on terror.

    At issue are interrogations carried out by the CIA, and the degree to which harsh tactics such as water-boarding were authorized by administration officials. A separate law, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, applies to the military.

    The Washington Post first reported on the War Crimes Act amendments Wednesday.

    One section of the draft would outlaw torture and inhuman or cruel treatment, but it does not contain prohibitions from Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions against "outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment." A copy of the section of the draft was obtained by The Associated Press.

    Another section would apply the legislation retroactively, according to two lawyers who have seen the contents of the section and who spoke on condition of anonymity because their sources did not authorize them to release the information.

    One of the two attorneys said that the draft is in the revision stage but that the administration seems intent on pushing forward the draft's major points in Congress after Labor Day.

    "I think what this bill can do is in effect immunize past crimes. That's why it's so dangerous," said a third attorney, Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice.

    Fidell said the initiative is "not just protection of political appointees, but also CIA personnel who led interrogations."

    Interrogation practices "follow from policies that were formed at the highest levels of the administration," said a fourth attorney, Scott Horton, who has followed detainee issues closely. "The administration is trying to insulate policymakers under the War Crimes Act."

    The Bush administration contends Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions includes a number of vague terms that are susceptible to different interpretations.

    Extreme interrogation practices have been a flash point for criticism of the administration.

    When interrogators engage in waterboarding, prisoners are strapped to a plank and dunked in water until nearly drowning.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Congress "is aware of the dilemma we face, how to make sure the CIA and others are not unfairly prosecuted."

    He said that at the same time, Congress "will not allow political appointees to waive the law."

    Larry Cox, Amnesty International USA's executive director, said that "President Bush is looking to limit the War Crimes Act through legislation" now that the Supreme Court has embraced Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. In June, the court ruled that Bush's plan to try Guantanamo Bay detainees in military tribunals violates Article 3.

  -------

[cenacle]

when the fascist fucks lose control of the Congress, a lot of them are going to be on the chopping block, this current effort is to legalize what they have been doing in the illegal war and occupation in Iraq, and elsewhere...sniff blood in the air? sweating fear? that's neo-con motherfuckers seeing their day of justice coming...oh baby are they gonna get grilled :twisted:

[lollipop guild]

The neo-cons should be tried for war crimes, imo. But I don't believe the dems will have the stomach for that sort of reckoning even if they do gain a majority in the senate and/or congress.

guild rep #8