How to End a Presidential Campaign

[cenacle]

How to end a presidential campaign
By Ben Smith

Published May 12, 2008 at Politico.com
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10262.html

There are 50 ways to leave your lover, 13 ways of looking at a blackbird, and at least six ways to drop out of a presidential race. With Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign running on empty with little hope of victory, the New York senator's allies and independent observers alike have begun to consider which one she’ll choose.

Clinton is balancing a range of considerations: her bank account; her political future and the party’s; her need to win back Obama’s supporters, particularly African-Americans; and her need to keep faith with voters in her own (nearly) half of the party, many of whom have grown to dislike her rival.

And so her options range from swift and gracious (although time is running out on that one) to the political version of Custer’s last stand: taking a losing hand to the Democratic National Convention in August. Each has its benefits and its drawbacks, but together they’re what’s left of Clinton’s options.

1) Never Say Die: There’s no rule that Clinton has to drop out just because she can’t win. The loser’s road to the August Democratic National Convention is a humiliating, unlikely path â€" she’d be broke, and she'd have to sit by and watch as her supporters defected, one by one, to the likely winner. On the other hand, the National Weather Service estimates that there’s a 1 in 2.8 million chance that Obama (or anyone else) will be struck by lightning in the next three months.

And hey, it’s working for Ron Paul.

2) Extract a Job: Clinton still has leverage. Every day she’s in the race, she reminds the media of Obama’s weaknesses with some voters and drives what threatens to become a self-fulfilling narrative about his inability to connect to working-class white voters. Bill Clinton, meanwhile, is roaming rural America, stoking the same resentments Republicans hope to use against Obama in the fall.

It’s a kind of political protection racket, and she can try to force Obama to offer her something to make it stop â€" a spot on the ticket, a Cabinet post or maybe just allegiance to her vision of health care reform. More remotely, she could seek the promise of Obama’s support in the 2010 New York governor’s race if the incumbent, David Paterson, doesn’t seek reelection.

The downside of this racket, however, is that the longer it goes on, and the more leverage she builds, the more it threatens to damage Clinton â€" and at a hale 60, she doesn’t seem quite ready to write off her future in national politics.
 

3) Cash Out: Some in Clinton’s inner circle â€" and, by some accounts, both Clintons â€" flatly believe Obama can’t win in November. If they really believe it, there’s no use extracting anything from him but money; who needs a key role in an administration that’s not going to exist? And she needs it: Clinton has loaned her campaign more than $11 million and owes a similar sum to vendors, including the sometimes-litigious Mark Penn. Clinton’s implicit threat would be the same, but in this variation of the end game, Clinton would press Obama for fundraising help to retire her mountain of debt, then campaign for him hard enough that nobody can blame her for his inevitable defeat.

4) Kicking and Screaming: Sometimes, it takes a silver-haired party figure to tell the candidate it’s over. In this case, however, the two most powerful figures in the Democratic Party are Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

But there are other powerful voices whose public and private calls could force Clinton from the race, even against her will. Among them are those belonging to former Vice President Al Gore; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.); Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.); and Clinton’s own senior staff.

And, of course, there’s the ultimate silver-haired Democratic icon: Clinton's husband, who has, it should be said, shown no inclination to pull her off the stump or abandon the stage himself.

5) Racial Meltdown: Key African-American supporters such as Rep. Charles B. Rangel, the African-American dean of New York’s congressional delegation, have stood by her. But if she’s more than a thorn in the side of the de facto first black Democratic nominee, that could change. Defections from black supporters such as Rangel and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (Ohio) would threaten Clinton with the mantle of racial division, anathema to her husband’s legacy and career poison in American â€" and particularly Democratic â€" politics.

6) Unconditional surrender: It’s Obama’s party now, and Hillary has to live in it. There’s no pretending that â€" if he’s elected in November â€" the junior senator from New York will have any real leverage over the president of the United States, no matter what private deal she thinks she’s cut. So win his gratitude, and that of his supporters, by withdrawing cleanly and quickly, and working hard for his election.[/img]

[cenacle]

I was up early this morning seeing KD off to the airport to go see kin, and I spent a long time online reading about what Clinton's motivations for staying in the race are right now. As far as I can tell, she really believes she can win, that she has momentum and is going to beat Obama. She claims he can't win against McCain and she can.

Despite every numerical factor against her...delegates, superdelegates, states won, popular vote, etc.

I'd like to credit her for stubbornness but it seems more like ego to me, a sense of entitlement, and I know what it smells like now: GEORGE BUSH AND IRAQ. He was going to lead the country there, like it or not, stay there, like it or not, wiretap Americans, like it or not, etc etc. He was the Decider, now she wants to be the Decider-ette.

Fuck, I can't wait til this primary thing is over. I'm mailing in our ballots today (Oregon does mail-in ballots). June 3 when the last one is done can't come soon enough. Clinton's concession can't come soon enough.

Does she give a damn about $4/gallon gas or the endless war in Iraq? She says so and maybe she does but I think she mostly cares about her own fate, her decision to win the White House. That's driving her, not the vital issues of the day...anyway...damned frustrating all of this...*rant off for now*

[Stonehenge]

She has turned into a spoiler. If she can't have it, she will deny it to Obama. I do not think she would make a good running mate. Obama is already seen as very very liberal. Last thing he needs is another extreme left winger on the ticket. He needs someone more moderate to attract the crossover vote or we will be stuck with president Mccain.

And what's this money she "loaned" to her campaign? Does that mean she expects to get repaid? Who the hell is going to pay her back? I think it means she will pocket whatever is left in the bank and hold fundraisers to get the rest. "Please donate so I won't go hungry"

[cenacle]

I agree. The "loan" is strange. It's her personal money yet she wants it paid back somehow.

I don't think of either of them as extreme left-wing, since there are clearly other people out there who are more to the left (Kucinich, Feingold, etc), but Obama is definitely left-of-center and he's not a fucking crime family's tool like GW Jr. is. Things will improve when he gets in.

As for Clinton, I am hoping her time in the race is short, Stoney. She can only cause harm from here on out.

[Stonehenge]

Whether you see Obama or Hill as "extreme" left wing or just a bit to the left of center, depends a lot on where you are looking from. You have to consider how the average voter will see them, not just the average democrat. I saw in the paper where Obama had the highest liberal voting record according to some watch group.

Hill will bring only negatives. The yellow dog demos will vote for either. Her baggage will turn off a lot of repubs and moderates who might hold their noses and vote Obama if he had someone even slightly conservative on the ticket. I don't know much about Eduards but he might be a possibility. Obama being a fresh face does not have as much negative baggage as she does. There is still the ABC vote to consider.

Her supporters were urged to donate but she wouldnt do it, she "loaned" the money to her own campaign. Hey, can I do that instead of donating to a candidate? Sounds like a better deal to me.

Mccain is an old style repub. Expect more just like reagan-bush-shrub from him. He, by his own admission, does not understand economics and is an extreme hawk on the war(s). We need someone who understands economics for a change.