Messages

[1. One reason that I question whether or not commercial airliners hit the towers is because:]

I hate to say it but I no longer believe that commerical airlines hit the WTC towers... I did for a very long time, and then I learned about Dr. Judy Wood and her amazing research, and it raised enough questions in my mind to start re-examining my belief that planes did hit the towers. Now, I honestly think it was something other than a major airliner.

1. One reason that I question whether or not commercial airliners hit the towers is because:

Softer elements cannot cut through harder elements, thus...

...Aluminum CANNOT cut through steel, just like copper does not cut through diamond (FACT).

...but Steel CAN cut through Aluminum. (FACT).

In fact, BIRDS can even cut through Aluminum (see below).



So, for those of you that have been assuming that aluminum can some how cut through steel, I now have a question for you:

If birds can cut through aluminum (as seen in the picture of the aluminum airplane that hit a bird), does that mean birds can cut through steel?

It is commonly known in chemistry that harder elements can cut through softer elements, but not the reverse. The "hardness" of a material is classified using Mohs Scale, which explains how 'harder' materials can scratch / cut 'softer' materials, but not the other way around. See here: http://chemistry.about.com/od/geochemistry/a/mohsscale.htm and here: http://www.jewelry-secrets.com/Other/Wh ... Scale.html

This is why Diamond, one of the hardest materials of all, is used in the toughest situations, because it cuts through most everything since it is one of the hardest materials known.

Aluminum is much softer than Steel, therefore, Aluminum cannot cut through Steel, just like Copper cannot cut into Diamond.

I learned this in junior high school Chemistry, and it was a basic concept that was used over and over again throughout highschool and college chemistry courses.

There are a few exceptions I know of, one of which is when water is highly focused and sprayed at high velocity to cut through metals. They often add abrasive elements to the water to assist with cutting. The water has to be focused into a very narrow beam though so that all of the pressure is applied to a very small area, and the water has to be accelerated to 900+ miles per hour. see here: http://science.howstuffworks.com/question553.htm

Another exception is when a lead bullet pierces through harder metals, but as with the water exception, this is because the lead bullet exerts its pressure on a very small surface area, striking at a very extreme velocity.


2. Another reason is because many of the hijackers have been reported to be alive and well.

See here:

1. http://guardian.150m.com/september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htm  

2. http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/identities.html

 
3. Another reason I believe commercial airliners did not hit the towers is because many videos have shown some type of infrared light-targetting mechanism on the WTC buildings as the "plane" approached, which is characteristic of a large cruise missile of some kind. Here, see the light for yourself:

1. Laser Targeting UAV, Evidence of Military Technology on 9/11:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q

2. ABL Laser spotting and fly by wtc I jet impact:  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9z15bgkoy4


And here is just one of several types of remote piloted cruise missiles which could have been used: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/agm-86c.htm

4. And here is another reason, relating to video footage that has not really been closely examined by the mainstream media:

Chopper 5 & the Missing Shadow: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYQHD69ojGY


5. And here is yet another reason I have been questioning the official airlinre story, after seeing how easy it is to create a fake airliner impact using computer technology:

9/11 Ghost Plane Theory - Digital Computer Recreation of WTC Plane Impact: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWZyXRuz1Uk

 
I'm not saying I know exactly what happened, I just see too much evidence contradicting the "airliner" story to accept it without a doubt.

It seems that the criminals behind 9/11 are getting us to hate terrorists AND hate our government, by blaming the "hijackings" on terrorists and blaming 9/11 on our government. I think the reality of the situation is that the "terrorists" behind 9/11 are trying to blame everyone else so that they can get away with the 9/11 attacks and use 9/11 to bring about the police-state they desire within the USA.

Please let me know your thoughts,


-Abe

i am similar to you, in the sense that I do not categorize myself politically. I have both democratic and republican values, and I do not claim a party.

i think the reason many attack the different views of others is because we are currently trapped in a system that has been steered / manipulated into being one that divides and conquers. by pushing duality on us rather than a wider spectrum of choices (e.g. coke vs pepsi, repub vs democrat, pro-life vs pro-choice, etc.), those that fund the elections can more easily divide and conquer and manipulate our decisions.

that is my 2 cents.

i think it makes much more sense to have a much wider range of parties promoted, and perhaps a council of paper making decisions for our country, not just 2 parties and one president.

just my 2 cents.

-Abe

I agree with you dude, I think that the small group of people behind 9/11 are trying to get us to blame foreign terrorists AND our government, to create chaos and to hide the identity of those truly behind 9/11.

after learning much new information, i think it is highly more likely, as you said, that a group of people got a hold of this weaponized energy technology and has used it against us.

i know i didn't address all the points you made but I wanted to let you know that for the most part I am thinking along similar lines to you.

i think the military investigated his technology and started developing it on their own, and that somehow, this technology fell into the wrong hands. now, the people who used the weapon technology for their own benefit, is using information to confuse us and mislead us away from the true perpetrators, by blaming our government and foreign islamic terrorists.

i think the people behind 9/11 are the same people trying to discredit Mr. Hutchison and blame others for 9/11. just my 2 cents.

thanks for discussing

-Abe


also...

just wanted to tell you all that you can observe some amazing videos and documentaries about The Hutchison Effect and other related subjects at my recently created YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/pookzta

there are tons of videos so feel free to check them out if this stuff interests you at all.

here is a more recent video of Mr. Hutchison distorting a block of iron (using energy): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnBdhsXl088

[John Hutchison has submitted a sworn affidavit for the courts, which in effect means that if he is lying, he could potentially go to prison.]

Also...

John Hutchison has submitted a sworn affidavit for the courts, which in effect means that if he is lying, he could potentially go to prison.

see the official affadavit here (I got it from his website): http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2469003/AffJHutch.pdf

We got your back mon. Thanks for bringing this to light. You might be one of the most important people alive, with the information you apparently have. I'd say you are getting close to the truth. And you might just be the first.  There's no way the major is just another crack pot. He knows too much.

lw

Thanks LW.

The information I have is out there for everyone to see. A lot of it is presented in the Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Judy Wood thread. Spirit Plants Radio is in touch with me right now to set up an interview to discuss 9/11, but rather than me doing it myself, I think I am going to try and arrange an interview between Niall and Dr. Judy Wood if he is willing. This way she can discuss her evidence herself over the air. She has done quite a few shows already, and her work is picking up steam, so hopefully we can expose this second layer of the 9/11 cover up that is happening right now.

Thanks for commenting,

-Abe


P.S. - I found out that Major Rokke is with the ARMY, and that he is also listed on PatriotsQuestion911.com's main page if you go there and just search ROKKE.

[Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect]

here are some related videos that I wanted to share with you all:

Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57ZKTA7nx8U

Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on Anti-Gravity Technology:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeNesaRUoJo

Colonel Tom Bearden on Military Energy Weapon Technology (1985) similar to The Hutchison Effect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MovpYUD7fTY

Directed Energy Weapon Technology was used on 9/11:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 433909308#

cool comments folks! i also dig the information in the last post, very interesting because I did not know about that.

Science & Spirituality, what a combo eh?

Peace to you all,

-Abe

Hey folks,

Thanks for discussing this!

My personal opinion is that this was done by EISCAT, not a rocket. Too much evidence suggests that the spiral was created by EISCAT to be ignored.

Just my 2 cents,

-Abe

[Major Doug Rokke]

Dear Friends,

Major Doug Rokke from the United States Army contacted me recently and is now trying to convince me that only nano-thermite or other explosives were used on 9/11, but NOT energy weapons. He refuses to acknowledge the existence of Energy Weapons, other than lasers, that are possessed by the military.
 
He does not want to meet with me in public, but insists that I come meet him at his private dwelling just outside of Urbana-Champaign.

He has contacted me because I have recently been spreading information about Dr. Judy Wood and her research, and he insists that we meet in "private" so he can "show me something" related to proving that nano-thermite or other explosives were used on the WTC buildings, but NOT energy weapons.

I'm not going to meet with him, because I asked Dr. Wood about him and apparently he is trying to cover up her work.

Major Doug Rokke attended one of Dr. Judy Wood's "New Hiroshima" presentations, and he sat front and center and tried to disrupt her, interrupt her, and constantly yelled unprofessional statements throughout her lecture to try and discredit her. This is one reason I am not meeting with him.

Another reason I am not meeting with him is because I recently contacted one of my Deans that I trust, and she said that Major Doug Rokke was fired from the University of Illinois a long time ago for claiming he was a professor, when in fact he is not. Apparently he has a long history of lying and deceitfulness, so my Dean strongly suggested that I do not meet with him, and she is already making some calls about him given this recent information.

If you don't believe me, please email me at mailto:Abrahm@Mindoutpsyde.com">Abrahm@Mindoutpsyde.com and I can dig up some of the emails for you.

In addition, AE911Truth (Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) found out I was telling people about how they silently removed me from their petition just for asking Richard Gage a question in a private email about Dr. Judy Wood, so they recently emailed me for the first reply ever saying that they want to give me a refund so that I will stop talking about them negatively. They couldn't reply to my private email question but now they are contacting me to trying to refund my $100 so that I will stop talking about it? Weird.

So if I disappear randomly, please start investigating Major Doug Rokke from the USA Military who lives near Urbana-Champaign and works with the University of Illinois and is trying to contact me to convince me that only nano-thermite and explosives were the only things used on 9/11. He seems hell-bent on trying to convince me that Energy Weapons were not used, but explosives were.

Thanks for reading,

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M1 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

HOw come....

How come Dr Jones wasn't allowed to observe that Dr Woods was a bigger flake than he was and kick her out of the group?

IF Dr Jones really is attempting to create a smokescreen for a cover up, how come Dr Wood wants to remain a part of that organization?

How come discrediting the "thermite" conspiracy theory gives credence to the cold fusion theory?

HOw come attending med school appears to give one the bona fides required to be an authority on the truth of 9/11, the cover up that entailed, secret cold fusion weapon production, waging covert war against one's own people or free energy for that matter?  

ps: I know plenty of crack pot doctors. Intelligence doesn't preclude a runaway imagination nor the crackpotism that may ensue, imo.

lw

Hey there LW, thanks for posting!

First of all, I am not some kind of 9/11 expert, especially because my field of expertise is biology and medicine, so if anything, I am very unqualified for this job. Still, it is easy to read articles, view videos, and share information with others, and that is all I am doing.

Secondly, Dr. Judy Wood has a Ph.D in Materials Science Engineering, so she is highly qualified to speak about what turned the materials in the WTC buildings to dust. Even physicists, like Dr. Steven Jones, are less qualified than she is.

Thirdly, here is a quick video which might provide some information about how people like Dr. Steven Jones helped to cover up the truth about Cold Fusion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lASyX1SP2UM

Lastly, Dr. Judy Wood has never tried to re-enter that group nor be a part of it again, so I am not sure why you say that she desires to be a part of it.

Thanks for sharing your opinion, I admit that I could be very wrong about all of this, but I have been researching 9/11 for nearly a year now so I feel like I have a good idea of what is going oin.

Just my 2 cents, so thanks for sharing yours.

Peace,

-Abe

[Dear Fellow 9/11 Truth Supporter,]

Dear Fellow 9/11 Truth Supporter,

My name is Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, and I am a medical student. Throughout my rigorous undergraduate science and medical science coursework, I have had the privilege of receiving extensive training in the process of scientific analysis and evidence-based thinking.

I am writing to you today not only as a medical student, but also as a concerned American citizen, to ask for your help with something very important.

Have you heard of Dr. Judy Wood? Did you know she has been researching 9/11 since 2001 and has already filed several law suits against NIST and Congress demanding a new investigation and requesting that NIST's false data gets reexamined? Surprisingly, Dr. Steven Jones has not supported Dr. Wood's legal attempts to push for 9/11 Truth. Dr. Judy Wood has received many threats due to the research she has done and evidence she has gathered, and 2 of her friends that were involved in Cold Fusion / Free Energy research were murdered. In contrast, Dr. Steven Jones has not filed any such law suits, nor has he filed his nano-thermite findings with Congress or NIST.

I.   Dr. Judy Wood has already filed several legal cases against NIST and many suspected military / defense / weapons organizations in 2007, including Data Quality Analysis (DQA), Request For Correction (RFC), and Qui Tam (whistle-blower) cases. She is actively pursuing 9/11 Truth with her lawyer, despite the lack of support she has received from Dr. Jones and his followers. One of the many reasons I believe that Dr. Jones may be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement is because Dr. Jones has not filed his nano-thermite findings with NIST or with Congress, when he should have done so long ago if he truly wished to further the 9/11 Truth Movement. The many legal documents Dr. Judy Wood has filed in her pursuit of 9/11 Truth can be observed here:

1.   http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html  
2.   http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST ... Wood.shtml    

II.   Dr. Judy Wood was once a highly involved member of Dr. Jones's group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, but Dr. Jones suddenly expelled her from the group a while ago, simply because he disagreed with her conclusion that some form of Directed Energy Weapon was used to demolish the World Trade Center buildings. Dr. Wood has gathered overwhelming evidence suggesting that a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind was used to vaporize ('dustify') the primary steel and concrete portions of the buildings into dust, while leaving paper, aluminum, and many other materials completely unharmed. She has collected an overwhelming amount of photographic evidence which led to this conclusion, yet Dr. Jones disagrees with her so strongly that he decided to ban her from the group.

III.   It is important to consider the fact that Dr. Wood has actively been taking legal steps and scientific steps to pursue 9/11 Truth, yet Dr. Jones has banned her from his Scholars for 9/11 Truth group and has not supported her costly legal efforts to bring about a new 9/11 investigation. They both should be working together, but instead, Dr. Jones speaks negatively of Dr. Wood because he disagrees with her conclusions, even though her conclusions are strongly supported by evidence.

IV.   After reviewing this evidence, it seems very possible to me that Dr. Steven Jones is pushing the nano-thermite theory to mislead the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path to prevent us from finding out the true criminals behind 9/11, and the true cause of 9/11, which is related to Cold Fusion, Free Energy, and Directed Energy Weapons. Yes, the nano-thermite theory does account for some of the evidence, but it most certainly does not account for all of it.

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."  - Vladimir Lenin

V.   Please thoroughly review the following information with an open-mind, for it seems as though we need to examine Dr. Jones's motivations and figure out why Dr. Jones kicked Dr. Wood out of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth group a while ago, rather than collaborating with her to pursue 9/11 Truth. Please read this information thoroughly, for it is very, very important.

VI.   Dr. Judy Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bi-material joints. She has taught courses including: Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials), Strength of Materials Testing.

1.  Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D - 'The New Hiroshima' Presentation (Part 1): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1JFCpFd6CA  
2.  Dr. Judy Wood's website: http://www.drjudywood.com

VII.   Here are some very informative videos discussing the reality of The Hutchison Effect and other suppressed technologies, such as Cold Fusion, & Anti-Gravity, and Military Energy Weapon Technology:

1.   John Hutchison & The Hutchison Effect (Documentary | 68mins): http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... 2090712676  
2.   Cold Fusion Is Real (Documentary | 45mins) : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 4380820378
3.   Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57ZKTA7nx8U
4.   Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on Anti-Gravity Technology: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeNesaRUoJo
5.   Colonel Tom Bearden on Military Energy Weapon Technology (1985) similar to The Hutchison Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MovpYUD7fTY

VIII.   Please review the following evidence regarding Dr. Steven Jones, so that you can become familiar with all of the evidence that has led myself, and many others, to conclude that Dr. Steven Jones is purposely misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement. First he interfered with the Cold Fusion / Free Energy movement, and now it seems he is interfering with the 9/11 Truth Movement. Please review these links thoroughly, and with an open-mind, before drawing any conclusions:  

1.   'Hoax exposes incompetence or worse at a Bentham Open Access journal': http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009 ... se-at.html
2.   'Bentham Open editor-in-chief resigns after fake paper is accepted for publication': http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009 ... esign.html
3.   'A Peer-review of Dr. Jones's Research': http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=9 ... with_jones    
4.   'The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis': http://drjudywood.com/articles/scientif ... ethod.html
5.   'Steven Jones' Contributions to Science, Humanity and the Planet': http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/cc/CB.html    
6.   'WTC Molten Metal: Fact or Fiction?' http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/i ... &Itemid=60    
7.   'Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum' http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_ ... l#Thermite    
8.   'Steven Jones, Cold Fusion, & Free Energy': http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ7.html  
9.   'Steven Jones and the WTC "Spire" video' (2min 35sec): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9Iv_4ZfNI
10.   'No Thermite Used on 9/11' by Andrew Johnson: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
11.   'Steven Jones helped cover up Cold Fusion, and now 9/11 Truth': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lASyX1SP2UM

IX.   Here are some important questions to ask ourselves when comparing the conclusions of Dr. Steve Jones and Dr. Judy Wood:

•   How come steel and concrete were pulverized, aluminum had electrical burns, but paper was unharmed? Nano-thermite and heat do not selectively damage certain materials, so how come thousands and thousands of paper sheets were completely unharmed?
•   If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come there are many reports of power outages and electrical failures in the areas surrounding ground zero during the attacks?
•   If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, where is all the molten steel? Thousands of pictures, yet not a single one shows large quantities of molten steel?
•   If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come the resulting steel and concrete dust clouds were not hot enough to burn the people it coated nor to set adjacent buildings on fire?
•   If thermite alone caused the 'collapses', how come there was significant magnetosphere readings in Alaska at the very same time of the 9/11 attacks?
•   Why was the Alaskan magnetosphere normal until immediately before and during the 9/11 attacks, when there was suddenly a huge surge in electromagnetic activity?
•   If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero experienced metal warping and electricity-like burns and holes during the attacks, even though they were not exposed to thermite?
•   If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero were flipped upside down or on their side?
•   How come Dr. Wood has already filed several legal cases against suspected 9/11-involved defense and weapons companies and NIST, yet Dr. Jones has not?
•   How come Dr. Wood has already been taking legal steps towards demanding a new 9/11 investigation, yet Dr. Jones does not support her legal efforts?
•   How come Dr. Jones has not officially filed or shared his nano-thermite evidence with Congress, NIST, or any official governmental body? Why the delay?
•   Why is Dr. Jones just now claiming to be "pursuing a new 9/11 investigation" when Dr. Judy Wood has already filed many legal cases to pursue such an investigation, one which made it to the Supreme Court?
•   Why isn't Dr. Jones and his affiliates supporting Dr. Judy Wood's legal efforts to pursue 9/11 Truth, regardless of whether or not they agree on a theory?
•   Why did Dr. Jones ban Dr. Wood from his 'Scholars for 9/11 Truth' group just because they had different conclusions about what destroyed the towers?
•   Shouldn't we all be supporting the 9/11 investigation that Dr. Judy Wood has already demanded with her legal cases, even if we do not agree with her conclusions?
•   Why was I removed from the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition simply for asking Richard Gage to examine the research of Dr. Judy Wood?
•   I have donated over $100 to AE911Truth, so why was I silently removed from the petition simply for bringing up Dr. Judy Wood to Richard Gage?
•   Why did United States Army Major Doug Rokke spontaneously contact me to try and convince me to stop talking about Dr. Judy Wood and Energy Weapons?

X.   Either Dr. Steven Jones is lying, or Dr. Judy Wood is lying. One of them is misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement, and the evidence points to Dr. Steven Jones. After thoroughly researching both of their stories and all of the evidence presented by both parties, I honestly believe that it is most likely Dr. Jones that is lying, and that he is using his fame and credentials to mislead the 9/11 Truth Movement in the wrong direction to prevent us from supporting Dr. Judy Wood's legal actions and taking legal action of our own, to ultimately prevent us from finding out the true cause of 9/11 and the true criminals responsible for the attacks.

XI.   Also, I should let you know that I recently messaged Richard Gage and AE911Truth to ask him to contact  Dr. Judy Wood, and as a result, I have been removed from the Petition Signers list on AE911Truth.org, despite the fact that I have donated over $100 dollars to Richard Gage and his organization over the past several months. As of the morning of March 4th, my name was removed from the AE911Truth petition, so it appears that I have been removed from the petition simply for asking about Dr. Judy Wood. This is very concerning, because I have not done anything wrong by asking Richard Gage to talk to Dr. Judy Wood and consider her research, yet AE911Truth.org has removed me from their petition simply for asking about her once in a private email. In addition, Richard Gage has never replied to any of my emails over the past several months, not even one of them, but Dr. Judy Wood has responded to several of my emails in just the last week. Oddly enough, Dr. Wood predicted that Richard Gage and Dr. Jones would 'blacklist' me for mentioning her, and she was right.

XII.   Lastly, but most importantly, Major Doug Rokke from the U.S. Army contacted me recently and is trying to convince me that only nano-thermite or other explosives were used on 9/11, but NOT energy weapons. He refuses to acknowledge the existence of highly-advanced Energy Weapon Technology, other than lasers, that are possessed by the military-industrial complex. He does not want to meet with me in public, but insists that I come meet him at his private dwelling just outside of Urbana-Champaign. He has contacted me because I have recently been spreading information about Dr. Wood, and he insists that we meet in "private" so he can "show me something" related to proving that nano-thermite or other explosives were used on the WTC buildings, but not energy weapons. I'm not going to meet with him, because I asked Dr. Wood about him and apparently he is trying to cover up her work.  Major Doug Rokke attended one of Dr. Judy Wood's "New Hiroshima" presentations, and he sat in the front rows and repeatedly attempted to disrupt her, interrupt her, and yell unprofessional statements throughout her lecture to try and discredit her research.  This is one reason I am not meeting with him.  Another reason I am not meeting with him is because I recently contacted one of my Deans that I trust, and she said that Major Doug Rokke was fired from the University of Illinois a long time ago for claiming he was a professor, when in fact he is not. Apparently he has a long history of lies and deceit, so my Dean strongly suggested that I do not meet with him, and she is already making some calls about him given this recent information.

I strongly support the 9/11 Truth Movement as a whole and I definitely think we all need to work together to share ideas and information, so I truly hope that you will consider collaborating with Dr. Judy Wood in addition to Dr. Steven Jones, so we can all work together to bring about real 9/11 truth and justice. Even if Dr. Wood's conclusions do not resonate with you, we are all still pursuing truth and justice regarding 9/11, and therefore we need to work together. It is very concerning to me that Dr. Jones has chosen to outcast Dr. Wood simply because he does not agree with her conclusions, when he should be supporting her many legal cases. If Dr. Jones is indeed misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement, he needs to be exposed so that this movement can continue to make progress and move forward.

Please let me know how what you think about all this.

Thank you for your time, consideration, and help,

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M1 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

Irie Abe,
OH No! The government love us and wouldn't really do that!
Yeah, Right!
Respect
Z

hehe

I think our Government is good in general, but alls it takes is a few bad apples that climb to high-ranking places within that Government to corrupt it.

I look forward to seeing the venom getting sucked out of the system!

Thanks for commenting,

-Abe

[Anti-Gravity Technology is Real, Thanks to Nikolas Tesla & John Hutchison.]

Anti-Gravity Technology is Real, Thanks to Nikolas Tesla & John Hutchison.

John Hutchison & The Hutchison Effect (Documentary | 68mins): http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... 2090712676









Boyd Bushman from Lockheed Martin comments on The Hutchison Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eckSEyeIuRk

See more at: http://www.TheHutchisonEffect.com

Irie,
I have always contended that the craziest conspiracy theory has been the official one!
Far less Building #7!
BTW like your presentation, Bro.
Respect
Z

Well said bro, and thank you for the commenting!

-Abe

Irie Bro,

don't believe everything you are told by the mainstream media. we must use our best judgment and think for ourselves.

I never do!
Respect
Z

Glad to hear Zaka Although more and more seem to be thinking for themselves at the present time, unfortunately I still have many friends who believe whatever they are told by the mainstream media.

Glad you are thinking for yourself.

Happy Saturday to ya,

-Abe