My Review of a Visionary Guide to Mushroom Magick by Arik Moonhawk Roper with essays by Daniel Pinchback and Erik Davis and notes from mycologist Gary Lincoff.
As an expert in the field of ethnomycology, author of nine books and more than 30 published papers on hallucinogenic mushrooms, I personally like the idea of the book but could not endorse it as a reliable guide for amateur foragers to use in identifying species in the wild as the context of the book suggests that it is a 'comprehensive guide' to the species rendered inside the book.
It contains 94 full-paged watercolor renditions of hallucinogenic species. However, it is wrought with bad representations of the hallucinogenic psilocybian species featured in the guide. The author also painted 9 species that are not active species, but are often listed in edible and other mushroom field guides as possibly hallucinogenic, most whose original analysis was based on false positives of such species and obtained by chemical analysis in the early history of these mushroom species. The book also presents 9 species which do not contain the tryptamine alkaloids, psilocine/psilocybine and which are not active at all. Also included are 6 images not identified by name, but appear as to fill space in the book.
In many images the stems are either too fat and thick or to skinny to belong to actual specimens of the species he is portraying in this pictorial and many of those species represented also have caps in which their shapes are either too large and bulbous and are also not representative of the species and the artist also was not able to correctly sketch the veils on certain species found in the PNW and elsewhere throughout the world and left many without a striate margin which is normally visible in wet to semi-dried specimens.
His renditions of P. fimetaria, P. subfimetaria, P. stuntzii and P. silvatica are bad and do not look anything like the actual species. His rendering of Psilocybe cyanescens was also somewhat incorrect as the wavy caps had incurved margins which cyans do not have then they become wavy, they turn upward, not inward. So is the case with many other rendered paintings in this book. Another example is the perfect liberty cap drawing which is well done, and then the appearance of a second image of a cap of Psilocybe semilanceata with pure blue gills, a feature never happening in that species. In fact, the majority of liberty caps rarely contain any bluing in collected specimens, but Psilocybe gills never stain blue, a feature which only occurs on the stem and/or edges of a cap. Mr. Roper also labeled Panaeolina foenisecii as a Psilocybe rather then identifying it as a brown-spored species belonging to the genera of Panaeolina.
In the book, the author has two paintings of Panaeolina foenisecii.
Both are labeled as in the Psilocybe genera.
The first painting titled as Panaeolus foenisecii, kinda resembles a completely dried bell-shaped mushroom.
In the 2nd image of Panaeolus, he has the bands of color and a proper representation of the species, but he labeled it as Panaeolus koenisecii, a non-existing name for a species.
mjshroomer
I would never recommend this book to be used by amateurs seeking a relationship with the mushrooms described.
On the other hand, I am quite pleased with his renditions of Psilocybe cubensis and Amanita muscaria which are without a doubt, beautiful representations of those two species. Yet he also identifies a species of Amanita not associated with the chemicals found in Amanita muscaria.
More surprisingly is the fact that one of the most prominent and respected mycologists in the world, Gary Lincoff, an expert in the field of entheogenic fungi and edible and toxic mushroom identification who compiled and wrote notes to this guide, failed in catching these macroscopic mis characteristics of the species Mr. Roper painted in this book.
The Front and Back Cover of Mushroom Magick.
[attachment=1:1pdntfp9]roper1.jpg[/attachment:1pdntfp9]
[attachment=0:1pdntfp9]roper2.jpg[/attachment:1pdntfp9]
Not recommend for identification of magic shrooms.
I also want to add that his rendition of my mushroom, Psilocybe samuiensis Guzman, Bandala and Allen, was macroscopically very close in likeness to the actual species.