I came across the quote below years back when my wife bought me the book, "Planet Drum," by Mickey Hart.
There are different ways of listening to music. There is a technical state when a person who is developed in technique and has learnt to appreciate better music, feels disturbed by a lower grade of music. But there is a spiritual way, which has nothing to do with technique. It is simply to tune oneself to the music; therefore the spiritual person does not worry about the grade of music. No doubt, the better the the music the more helpful it is to a spiritual person; but at the same time one must not forget there are lamas in Tibet who do their concentrations and meditations while moving a kind of rattle, the sound of which is not specially melodious. They cultivate thereby that sense which raises a person by the help of vibration to the higher planes. There is nothing better than music as a means for the upliftment of the soul. - Hazrat Inayat Khan -
Many of my friends are musicians. Most know way more about musical technique than I do. Some are critical of shows we attend to the point that their enjoyment seems to come more from critiquing performances than exploring the emotion of the music being performed.
Part of me wishes that I'd studied musical theory as a youngster. But another part of me wonders if that might have lessened the magic I still experience as part of my listening pleasure.......
lw
Good post lw. Tecnique and theory are just tools to give you vocabulary. It is not the thing itself. I have met many Berklee grads that can't play a convincing blues to save their life. Skill is not what gives music its impact, if it was would we be pouring over Dead shows from 1966? At that point garcia was the only musician of the band, they were out of tune and out of time most of the time. To me what gives music its impact is the spiritual commitment and the emotional connection that the players make in real time. Hence Robert Johnson moves me way more than Eric Johnson.
But having said that, I would never say skill is not important. Playing great music is a daunting task, requires what Charles Mingus called "rotary perception". You got to be operating on multiple levels, its like walking a tight rope over a pit of alligators juggling chain saws. It's a real life thing. To make music you gotta play like your childrens lives depends on it as well as your own. The people I want on my bandstand are the same people I would want be my side going into battle.
I've been thinking about this thread a bunch. And I understand your muso friends, the critical function of your mind is hard to turn off if you have spent your life cultivating it. I had that problem for years but what finished it was reaching a point acceptance of my own abilities and talent, so I no longer had any self image to protect. Does that make any sense at all? The mystery of music goes so far beyond the intelectual.
As for music theory, its just the nuts and bolts side of music. I seeworking musicians as tradesmen as much as anything, the art happens from mastery of the craft. Garcia likened it to being plumbers, said if you would hang with his friends it would be like being in a room full of plumbers. Theory is just another tool, it makes no value judgments. It's not right or wrong, its about tendencies. Like if you stay on this side of the harmony your music will sound sedate and static but if you stray out of the channel it adds some tension. Music needs both tension a release and the Dead were master of that. Dark Star is a perfect example. There are no wrong notes, what a big part of theory is is anylizing the 'non-harmonic tones" which superficialy could be considered wrong, but in reality are what brings life to music.
Folk musician ask his buddy if he could read music, Holmes said "yes but not enough to hurt my playing"
Right on, jrl. I'm glad to hear your take on this subject.
The shows last week in Denver were just what the doctor ordered. (At least my doc.) On some levels, words can't describe the lessons gleaned. I know everyone leaves the shows with something different. Last week I got to see how far I've come in the last twenty years, had a parasite (co-worker) scraped off my back and even managed to spend a few minutes communing with my 94 year old grandmother who was no doubt tucked into bed and sleeping when this connection occurred. And when the going got sketchy, my lovely dove of a wife would bridge the 700 miles between us and wrap me in good vibes.
lw [/url]
Is your doc accepting new patients?? Ah, the power of music, Pharoh Sanders had a record out called "Music is the healing force of the Universe". Every so often someone comes up to me and says, "Man you guys' music really helped me get through my divorce (or death of a loved one, illness, depression, recovery ect). I love knowing that we are close to peoples hearts and souls.
LOL The doc is IN and accepting new patients but the price appears to be too steep for most. (Energy is the fee and one's current world view the cost.)
lw
However, we're now back to that place where explanations get tricky and labels shifty......
Listening to live music has been a passion of mine (and the wife's) since we were kids. We have caught all sorts of live acts over the years. But on a certain level, the music scene surrounding the grateful dead has influenced and affected me like no other.
While the potential might exist for any musical group to reach out and touch its audience like the dead have, I've encountered no other scene which fosters the magic produced between musicians and audience like those dirty hippies have managed to conjure....
lw
Here's a short bio on the guy I quoted in the original post. I really like his message so far.
http://www.om-guru.com/html/saints/khan.html (http://www.om-guru.com/html/saints/khan.html)
Hazrat Inayat Khan
Hazrat Inayat Khan was a Sufi teacher from India who started "The Sufi Order in the West" (now called the Sufi Order International) in the early part of the 20th century. Though his family background was Muslim, he was also steeped in the Sufi notion that all religions have their value and place in human evolution.
Inayat was born into a family of musicians in 1882. His grandfather was a well-known musician respected as a composer, performer, and developer of a musical annotation which combined a group of diverse musical languages into one simplified integrated notation.
The house in which he grew up was a crossroads for visiting poets, composers, mystics, and thinkers. There they met and discussed their views (religious and otherwise) in an environment of openness and mutual understanding. This produced in the young man a sympathy for many different religions, and a strong feeling of the "oneness" of all faiths and creeds.
Inayat would listen to the evening prayers sung in his household with great interest, and was impressed with the spiritual atmosphere produced by the chanting. From a young age, he was interested in going beyond thinking about religious issues. He wanted a direct "link with God".
He developed considerable skill at the Vina (an Indian instrument). At eighteen, he went on a concert tour throughout India intent on reviving some of the older folk songs which were being replaced by more popular melodies. He felt these songs carried a special spiritual quality which was being lost. This brought him some critical acclaim, and he was invited to perform in the courts of Rajas (the rulers of India's princely states who cooperated with the British).
Inayat began to seek spiritual guidance at this point. He had seen the face of a very spiritual bearded man off and on in his dreams for some time. One day in Hyderabad, he had a premonition that something important was about to occur. A short time later, the man he had seen in his dreams entered the room.
Both teacher and disciple were immediately drawn to each other. The teacher was Mohammed Abu Hasana (or Said Abu Hashim Mudan depending on one's source) whose family originally came from Medina, the sacred city of Islam in Saudi Arabia. Mohammed was a member of the Chishti Sufi Order that was introduced into India at the close of the 12th century A.D.
Inayat describes the close relationship the disciple should develop with his or her teacher:
The next thing in the attainment of the inner life is to seek a spiritual guide - someone whom a man can absolutely trust and have every confidence in, someone to whom one can look up to, and one with whom one is in sympathy - a relationship which would culminate in what is called devotion. And if once he has found someone in life that he considers his Guru, his Murshad, his guide, then he should give him all confidence, so that not a thing is kept back. If there is something kept back, then what is given might just as well be taken away, because everything must be done fully, either have confidence or not have confidence, either have trust or not have trust. On the path of perfection, all things must be done fully.
The Inner Life, Hazrat Inayat Khan, Orient Books, 1980, P. 43)
Inayat maintained close contact with his teacher for four years. During this time, he experienced a level of realization that made God a reality in his life. As his master lay dying, the teacher told him: "Go to the Western world my son and unite East and West through the magic of your music". Two years later, in September of 1910, Inayat sailed for America.
Inayat began to teach and discuss his world view with different people who would ask what to call this mode of thought. For a long time, Inayat refused to give it a name fearing it would create barriers between people. He would say only it was ancient wisdom from the one and only source. He emphasized how none of the great spiritual teachers gave a name to their religious views. Finally, knowing that a body of thought needs some identifier to unify it, he told people it was Sufism.
Inayat began to travel and lecture first in the United States and later in Europe. He traveled widely between 1910 and 1920. He decided to do more intensive teaching during the summer in France, and took up residence there near Paris in Suresnes where he could hold his "summer schools".
His teaching strongly emphasized the fundamental oneness of all religions. He was deeply concerned that many of the western religious traditions had lost knowledge of the "science of soul", and the prayer and meditation techniques necessary to develop higher consciousness in mankind.
This Sufi universalism, or interest in and respect for different religions is reflected in a saying by the thirteenth century Andalusian Sufi teacher Ibn 'Arabi. This respected scholar and mystic who authored among other works the classic Sufi retreat manual Journey To The Lord Of Power wrote:
Beware of confining yourself to a particular belief and denying all else, for much good would elude you - indeed, the knowledge of reality would elude you. Be in yourself for all forms of belief, for God is too vast and tremendous to be restricted to one belief rather than another. (Awakening - A Sufi Experience by Pir Vilayat Inayat Khan, Jeremy P. Tarcher - Putnam, New York, 1999, p. VIII)
It was at Suresnes that Inayat developed the Universal Worship service that is now associated with the "Sufi Order in the West". The ritual consists of an invocation, a reading from one of the holy books of the world's major religions, and the lighting of a candle for each tradition. A candle is also lit for all those individuals or religious systems (unknown or forgotten) that have inspired mankind. The ritual continues with a discourse, and ends with a blessing. One goal of the Universal Worship service is to show people from different cultures the many common elements they share in their religious traditions, and to create a sense of unity among people from different cultures by teaching them to read each other's scriptures and "pray each other's prayers".
Inayat said that he traveled a great deal not only to introduce people to the teachings but also to "tune the inner spheres of a country" to a "higher pitch of vibration". His disciple Sirkan Von Stolk talks about these vibrations during his meditation with Inayat:
At those moments he attuned and raised my consciousness to such a high degree that I could hardly stand it. The rate of vibration- that is the only way I can describe it - was so fantastic that it was almost too powerful for me, and I longed to return to the limited security of my own personality where I could I go on living at my own rhythm! (Memories of a Sufi Sage, Hazrat Inayat Khan by Sikar Van Stok with Daphne Dunlop, East-West Publications Fonds B.V., The Hague, 1967, p.40)
Inayat was also concerned that people who did esoteric practices and had deeper spiritual experience find ways to harmonize with the larger religious community and society of which they were a part. He wrote that a person deeply involved in the spiritual life could go to church, mosque, or temple and act in harmony with their fellow religious seekers though their paths might inwardly be very different. Thus, the Sufi at the Mosque, the householder sadhu at the Hindu temple, or the saintly person at the church would fit in with the larger community. Inayat recommended the such people carry out their responsibilities and practice the group's rituals as an ordinary member of their religious congregation. Such an approach conveys respect and admiration for religious people regardless of how they choose to practice their tradition.
In later life, Inayat went through a three stage set of realizations which had such a profound effect on him as to make him "almost unrecognizable" to those who knew him. Inayat claimed that while his consciousness was far removed from the body, he was obliged to pass through the different states of awareness that all human beings pass through in their development. The experience was analogous to Dante's experience of hell, purgatory, and heaven which concludes in the Beatific Vision of God.
Part of this initiation consisted of an experience of Hell. Hell is a place that the living visit in dreams, and the dead experience when their consciousness lives on to reap the results of their negative actions in life. Inayat's view was that hell in the afterlife is comparable to dreaming but much more intense.
The next vision was an experience of purgatory where souls suffer in an effort to move beyond their attachments and limitations. This act of purification requires a great effort of will.
The third vision was a stage of bliss where the human element was purified and purged to the point of illumination. Von Stalk describes Inayat as "cosmic" and as a being "now given up to service as a superb channel for the divine" following this final experience.
Inayat had been a tireless teacher, writer, and lecturer traveling and lecturing almost continuously for seventeen years. He had established his school in France, and a dedicated group of disciples. But, his difficult schedule had weakened him over the years. He left for India to see his homeland for the first time in seventeen years. He hoped to rest and meditate but was asked to lecture and graciously consented as was common. He died in New Delhi in 1927 of influenza.
Hazrat Inayat Kahn is probably the best known teacher of Sufism in America and Europe in the 20th century. His legacy of Sufi universalism or what one author terms "nonIslamic Sufism" is seen primarily in the three areas of the Sufi Order International organization, Omega Institute, and the Dances of Universal Peace.
Inayat's son Vilayet Khan, who died in 2004, had continued to spread the message of Sufism in the west. He also traveled and taught extensively and wrote several books. He was a co-founder of the Omega Institute, a large "new age" teaching institute in Rhinebeck New York begun in 1977. The center for the Sufi Order International is the Abode of the Message located since 1975 on an old Shaker community farm in New York State near Albany. They publish a magazine for spiritual seekers called Elixir (see link below).
Pir Zia Khan, the grandson of Inayat Khan, is the current leader of the Sufi Order International of North America. He studied Buddhism with the Dalai Lama as well as the classical Indian Sufism of the Chishtiya Order. He recently published a book titled Holy Mysteries of the Five Elements.
The Dances of Universal Peace developed by Samuel Lewis in conjunction with the Sufi Order and the modern dance teacher Ruth St. Denis are known throughout the world as a spiritual practice mixing meditation, song, and dance. Sufi Sam, as Lewis was known, was deeply influenced by his study with two people. One was Hazrat Inayat Khan of the Sufi Order, and the other was Ruth St. Denis, who was a teacher of Martha Graham and a feminist pioneer in the modern dance movement in America and Europe.
Lewis' and St. Dennis' idea of melding peace into the arts through dance drew on such diverse influences as Jalaleddin Rumi's whirling dervishes, modern dance, early American Shaker circle dances, square dancing, and Zen walking meditation (or kinhin) for patterns of movement. They combined the dance movements with spiritual prayers, chants, scriptures, mantras, and poetry from all the world's religions. Sam and Ruth also incorporated the Muslim concept of Zikir or "rememberence" of the divine name by emphasizing the repetition of simple spiritual phrases. They set these phrases to music and added the simple dance steps. Many of the early chants came directly from the sacred Muslim phrases used in Zikr.
The emphasis was on "meditation in movement" and on "participation, not presentation". The original dances, which numbered about fifty, have grown over the years to more than 500 in number. Lewis said he wanted to teach the hippies of San Francisco to dance. There was a cultural renaissance in San Francisco's music and art scene in the late sixtys and Lewis thought some of that enthusiasm could be channeled into spiritual practice through dance. He said he created the dances to show young people how to deepen their spirituality and as a way to help them find bliss (or get high) without the use of drugs.
The essential nonsectarian message of the Sufi Order International is still expressed in the Universal Worship service which honors all the world's major religions by reading passages from their holy books.
quote from above... Inayat was also concerned that people who did esoteric practices and had deeper spiritual experience find ways to harmonize with the larger religious community and society of which they were a part. He wrote that a person deeply involved in the spiritual life could go to church, mosque, or temple and act in harmony with their fellow religious seekers though their paths might inwardly be very different. Thus, the Sufi at the Mosque, the householder sadhu at the Hindu temple, or the saintly person at the church would fit in with the larger community. Inayat recommended the such people carry out their responsibilities and practice the group's rituals as an ordinary member of their religious congregation. Such an approach conveys respect and admiration for religious people regardless of how they choose to practice their tradition......
Its easy for me to draw comparisons between what is described above and the Dead scene. Some folks place of party can be another's place of spiritual/psychological growth. But it takes a special environment to foster that sort of community. And that environment is more a function of people than place, imo. Unfortunately, there are very few gatherings out here on the prairie where I feel free to freak to my hearts content.
lw
With all humility I hope I have learned my lessons well. The inspiration I got from my exposure to "the Dead scene" has stood the test of time and hopefully informs every note I play. Every time I strap it on I have a place to aim for, however far it may be. Garcia called them " a signpost to new space".
Let those with ears hear!!
What did the deadhead say when he couldn't find a dose??
This band sucks!
LOL I'll have to take your word for it, brawh. (What the head w/o a dose said.)
Btw, I'm hoping to get to see you "strap it on," sooner than later. We've been throwing around vacation ideas and the wife mentioned that hitting The City when Phil was in town might be a good idea. She doesn't have to tell me twice.
Oh yeah, I DO know the way to San Jose and Sacramento, too.....
lw [/i]
I would be glad to meet up after all these years, and the music is ever flowing.........
btw You know what ended the San Francisco sound?
Electronic tuneres. Budapump!! (everything is funnier with a rim shot)
And how many tripping hippies DOES it take to roll a joint?
Just one, as long as someone removed the lumber and any seeds beforehand....
lw
Thats pretty funny, Sometimes on Hoffmans bicycle I can do deliberate stuff, but things I do with a non thinking habitual muscle memory sense become problematic, like trying to roll a joint.
We took an old friend of mine to the Phil shows last week. The guy was a psychedelic ranger in college. I thought he'd be a fiend, but it was just the opposite. The first night he wouldn't go near that bicycle and the second saw him take only a couple of token tugs at the pedals. Definitely not enough effort to make it around the block.
Anyway, half way through the first set on the second night I felt a familiar tug and then made my way toward the balcony like the cheshire cat seeking a suitable stoop. I circled in on a spot in the back shadows and ended up right next to my old pal. For the next twenty minutes or so, the spirit had me in a headlock and the music was a cosmic connection between the stage and my crown chakra. That birdsong grabbed me like a python on a rat. I wanted to panic, but it felt so good. And then there was just the music. There was no inside or outside. Just music....Well, the music and my buddy tapping me on the leg to let me know he was glad to see me..
All I know is something
like a bird within him sang
All I know, he sang a little while
and then flew off......... - Doc Phil -
lw
I would dearly love to go to a show with you! And then have you come to a couple of mine. It's amazing what a couple of high vibration people can do to an average night at a honkey tonk.
I can't wait to get lit at the Torch.
JRL: This topic of listening has led me to an interesting place as of late. Its tempting to dismiss any "lessons" or "therapy" if you will, that I've gleaned from the dead scene as a result of the sacrament and personal insight facilitated by the music. But that scenario oversimplifies the situation, imo. I believe that hundreds/thousands of people experiencing music and sacrament create a level of consciousness which can't be adequately explained with words. Direct participation seems to be the only way to grasp the concept and even then not everyone seems to get it. But that might just be due to the lack of words to describe the event.
lw
I agree totally. Haveing only seen them maybe 10-12 times I'm sure I have missed out on a lot, but 2 shows in particular I experienced stuff that defies words but has stuck with me all these years.
The dead family operates/communicates on levels not common in society in general, imo. And that multiple level of exploration leads to some novel spaces. SOme feel like a homecoming of sorts. Some can be intense. Some overwhelming. (at least for me.)
My dead experience was fun and games for about the first five years. Strange but fun. Then things got intense for me. Mysteries presented. Courage wavered. Fear competed. The last five years have been the best for me. The toostoned years were too much! Talk about psychedelic adventure....
Remaining grounded in the above circumstances has been an issue for me. It only takes a few daze in Denver mingling with throngs of dirty hippies to get me homesick for our simple life out here on da prairie. Cause I'm a hermit at heart.
Momma, momma, many worlds I've come since I first left home.... - coupl-0 stinking hippies -
lw
I found the shows, 2 in particular to be undeniable evidence of the reality of spiritual dimensions. Communicating is a good word, it was nothing but communion. I SAW the energy transaction between the crowd and the band and the band/crowd.
First one was at the "retirement" show in 74 at Winterland, the one in the Grateful Dead movie. Being a bit removed from the scene I had no idea I was walking into one of the ones that has gone down in history. First thing I noticed was 2 drum sets, hadn't seen Mickey in years. People were performing acts of magic all through the crowd. The guy in front of me was doing something with this lumps of what looked like gold attatched to a piece of leather, some sort of alchemy. The band played and played, Ned Lagin and Phil did some noodling on the break. They came back and the room was humming louder as the ceiling flew away. We called out for another round...... oops wrong band but it still fits. I could SEE the space, the void, the morphogenic field. Funny how when you describe something like this the words slip iut from under you, though I can still remember the experience so clear. At the end of the show Weir said, see you next year with a brand new band.
Fast forward to 93 Cal Expo, some have reffered to this a s the last great run. TJ and I had just started going together. First set we stood by the soundboard and I watched the crowd give its energy to the band. It looked like Weir was standing in the surf from my third eye vantage point. Wanting to sit down we moved to the back of the amphitheater into the stands on the set break, When the band played I watched them give back to use the venue looked like a big bowl filling uo with milk. Never has my third eye been so open. It took me 2 days to recover.
Here is the kicker: I didn't dose at either of those shows knowingly, maybe I got squirted but I don't think so.
There IS nothing like a Grateful Dead show!
Now, picture the two shows mentioned, jrl, and throw a stiff dose into da mix.....
We caught the five shows leading up to the sacramento gigs in '93 and I really enjoyed the Oregon and No Cal vibes on that run, even though the last couple of gigs at shoreline did get a little intense for me..... hehe
I enjoyed the time we spent at Cal Expo in the late 80's. But for some reason, I felt a little claustrophobic in that venue on occasion. (And I like small spaces.) But I met some neat people there and even helped a brotha back into his body after a particularly grueling set one evening. Later, he told me that I had become the devil in his eyes that night. bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
lw
I went to a couple 80s shows at the Cal Expo 86 and 88 I think. Another good one, that you see pics of alot was the wall of sound show at UN Reno. That was in 74 I think and the Dead couldn't sell out the stadium at that point.
So, listening.....
I'm not sure we humans fully understand consciousness and all that entails. But I do believe that certain knowledge concerning nonverbal communication has indeed been passed down from generation to generation by various groups.
I believe that musicians on stage can form a psychic bond with audience members through the music played and sacraments ingested magnify that connection. Funny how one persons' church service can be another's party. I also believe that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.... Something non-tangible takes place that isn't able to be described with words, imo. So I'll stop now and just listen.
lw
quote from the Hindu Saint site linked above...In Hinduism, it is believed that certain individuals have developed spiritually to the point where they can lead others to liberation (moksha), or give them access to spiritual states either in this life, or after death. These teachers are believed to have special abilities, such as the capacity to give darshan (a transfer of blessings or spiritual power from guru to disciple via glance or mantra). In addition, some Gurus are said to be able to enter a disciple's dreams to give teachings or initiation. Sometimes the guru's gaze can cause a profound spiritual experience. Many students claim to sense a spiritual atmosphere around their teacher which affects their moods and perceptions in positive ways.
Blessings via mantra, eh? If a mantra is the chanting of certain sounds, we're getting awful close to the realm of music, no?
Teaching through dream state?
I see many similarities between the ancient beliefs quoted above and my experiences with the dead family.
Its here that spirituality meets music and active sacrament for some. Its also the point wherea seeker might very well end up jailed for his/her foray into the spirit through sound and sacrament....
lw
Anyway, back to listening...
Clearing one's mind of superfluous inner dialogue is required. For me that starts with dose management with a nod toward gastrointestinal management. I prefer to eat a light meal a few hours before show time; I don't want to feel bogged when the groove gets good. Depending on the sacrament, I like to dose about 45 minutes to an before the gig. After consumption of sacrament, I usually put myself into a light trance in preparation for the main event. Upon entering a venue, I usually end up wandering the floor, looking for a place to stash my shoes and sweatshirt. Its during this ritual that I usually start to feel the first effects of the sacrament in question. I begin to feel uncoordinated and antsy. Mingling through the crowd I imagine tendrils of consciousness mixing with those I pass on my random route. I usually find a spot on the floor with good energy before the music starts. Deep breathing and an attempt to slow my physical functions follows. Hopefully, by the time the first notes sound, my systems have been powered down sufficiently for the music to take over....
lw
and then there are the first notes. For some venues, this is when the quest for the cleanest sound starts. For places we know, like the Philmore, I look for specific spots in my favorite listening area without talking audience members. (And that's getting tougher as we go.)
Most shows, I close my eyes. I can picture a cosmic electrical connection from the stage that plugs into the crown chakra. Thoughts become music, lyrics raw emotion. Music controls motion. Energy eminates and mingles with those nearby. The crowd becomes individual cells of a giant battery. Direct communication on a psychic level from the stage makes it difficult to decide if the music is playing or being played by the band. Reactions are instantaneous to the point that I might feel like I have some small input to the output....
lw
Some nights, its the band and audience. Other nights, the spirit might make Its' presence known in a more tangible fashion. When the spirit comes knocking, I've learned its best (at least for me) to find a corner in which to curl, crown chakra always pointed at the stage. Remaining physically and mentally still is vital to this subtle communion, imo. This is where fear has pounced on me in the past; where I've learned to remain steady in the present. The here and now. The hear and know. Where deep and haunting melodies are born and decay before our ears. Stillness reigns amid the chaos. Ego falls away. My body flushes with a peculiar fever before the cosmic pressure drops. The embrace is loosened. Boons granted. Insight gleaned. Deep breath while our immediate musical future is bandied about on stage. Usually the mood lightens and we can coast toward the set break, content.
lw