http://www.infowars.com/articles/ww3/ir ... _march.htm (http://www.infowars.com/articles/ww3/iran_russian_mp_us_attack_march.htm)
Russian MP Says US To Attack Iran Late March
Muslim riots a US psyop aimed at getting EU support for war
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | February 7 2006
A top Russian parliamentary leader has told Ekho Moskvy radio station that an attack on Iran is inevitable and that it will occur on March 28th. The leader of the Liberal Democrats Vladimir Zhirinovsky also believes that the Muslim riots were orchestrated by the US to garner European backing for the military strike.
Rhetoric has heated significantly in the past week with Donald Rumsfeld yesterday warning that a military option was on the table, echoing the comments of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist who said that the US was prepared to take military action.
Also, Israeli acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stated that Iran would pay "a very heavy price" if the Islamic Republic defiantly resumes full-scale uranium enrichment to build nuclear weapons.
Zhirinovsky told the Russian radio station that, "The war is inevitable because the Americans want this war. Any country claiming a leading position in the world will need to wage wars. Otherwise it will simply not be able to retain its leading position."
"The date for the strike is already known â€" it is the election day in Israel (March 28). It is also known how much that war will cost,†said Zhirinovsky.
Commenting on the Muslim riots sweeping the Middle East and Europe, Zhirinovsky (pictured above) said that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a planned psyop on the part of the US and aimed to “provoke a row between Europe and the Islamic worldâ€.
“It will all end with European countries thanking the United States and paying, and giving soldiers,†said Zhirinovsky.
The possible inorganic manufactured nature of the riots has to be seriously considered. The three most offensive cartoons that caused the outrage were not even printed in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper but were added in and handed out by Danish imams who “circulated the images to brethren in Muslim countries,†according to the London Telegraph.
It also appears highly suspicious that Muslims in Gaza City and other places had gained access to a plentiful supply of Danish flags to burn in front of the waiting world media as soon as the controversy broke out.
It now comes to light that Merete Eldrup, managing director of JP/Politikens Hus, the company that published the cartoons, is the wife of Anders Eldrup. Anders Eldrup is a Bilderberg member who has attended the last five Bilderberg meetings. The Bilderberg Group is a shadowy organization that meets once a year to steer global policy. It is now widely acknowledged that Bilderberg set the date for the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.
The violent demonstrations, on the back of last November's French riots, are clearly having the effect of hardening European sympathy towards Muslims, even as the governments of major European countries open the floodgates to mass immigration. This greases the skids for an accelerated invasion of Iran who yesterday announced they were cutting trade with Denmark over the offensive cartoons.
Director of the Russian Political Research Institute Sergei Markov previously warned that Israel was likely to conduct air strikes against Iran in the spring.
The window of opportunity seems to be forming for the US and Israel. The White House meeting memo proves that UN consultations and possible sanctions are mere window dressing for a plan of action that has already been decided upon. What remains to be seen is if the US or Israel will attempt to manufacture a staged war provocation to goad the Iranians into signing their own death warrant. The memo, released by QC Philippe Sands, contained details of a discussion between Tony Blair and George Bush where a plan to paint a US spy plane in UN colors and fly it low over Iraq in the hope that Saddam would order it shot down was debated.
this is all just completely screwed. :evil:
This was at entheology.org
-----------
"...to support the rapid development of new programs" Yep, were screwed for sure.
-----------
Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps
News Analysis/Commentary, Peter Dale Scott,
New America Media, Jan 31, 2006
Editor's Note: A little-known $385 million contract for Halliburton subsidiary KBR to build detention facilities for "an emergency influx of immigrants" is another step down the Bush administration's road toward martial law, the writer says.
BERKELEY, Calif.--A Halliburton subsidiary has just received a $385 million contract from the Department of Homeland Security to provide "temporary detention and processing capabilities."
The contract -- announced Jan. 24 by the engineering and construction firm KBR -- calls for preparing for "an emergency influx of immigrants, or to support the rapid development of new programs" in the event of other emergencies, such as "a natural disaster." The release offered no details about where Halliburton was to build these facilities, or when.
To date, some newspapers have worried that open-ended provisions in the contract could lead to cost overruns, such as have occurred with KBR in Iraq. A Homeland Security spokesperson has responded that this is a "contingency contract" and that conceivably no centers might be built. But almost no paper so far has discussed the possibility that detention centers could be used to detain American citizens if the Bush administration were to declare martial law.
For those who follow covert government operations abroad and at home, the contract evoked ominous memories of Oliver North's controversial Rex-84 "readiness exercise" in 1984. This called for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to round up and detain 400,000 imaginary "refugees," in the context of "uncontrolled population movements" over the Mexican border into the United States. North's activities raised civil liberties concerns in both Congress and the Justice Department. The concerns persist.
"Almost certainly this is preparation for a roundup after the next 9/11 for Mid-Easterners, Muslims and possibly dissenters," says Daniel Ellsberg, a former military analyst who in 1971 released the Pentagon Papers, the U.S. military's account of its activities in Vietnam. "They've already done this on a smaller scale, with the 'special registration' detentions of immigrant men from Muslim countries, and with Guantanamo."
Plans for detention facilities or camps have a long history, going back to fears in the 1970s of a national uprising by black militants. As Alonzo Chardy reported in the Miami Herald on July 5, 1987, an executive order for continuity of government (COG) had been drafted in 1982 by FEMA head Louis Giuffrida. The order called for "suspension of the Constitution" and "declaration of martial law." The martial law portions of the plan were outlined in a memo by Giuffrida's deputy, John Brinkerhoff.
In 1985, President Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive 188, one of a series of directives that authorized continued planning for COG by a private parallel government.
Two books, James Mann's "Rise of the Vulcans" and James Bamford's "A Pretext for War," have revealed that in the 1980s this parallel structure, operating outside normal government channels, included the then-head of G. D. Searle and Co., Donald Rumsfeld, and then-Congressman from Wyoming Dick Cheney.
After 9/11, new martial law plans began to surface similar to those of FEMA in the 1980s. In January 2002 the Pentagon submitted a proposal for deploying troops on American streets. One month later John Brinkerhoff, the author of the 1982 FEMA memo, published an article arguing for the legality of using U.S. troops for purposes of domestic security.
Then in April 2002, Defense Dept. officials implemented a plan for domestic U.S. military operations by creating a new U.S. Northern Command (CINC-NORTHCOM) for the continental United States. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld called this "the most sweeping set of changes since the unified command system was set up in 1946."
The NORTHCOM commander, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced, is responsible for "homeland defense and also serves as head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).... He will command U.S. forces that operate within the United States in support of civil authorities. The command will provide civil support not only in response to attacks, but for natural disasters."
John Brinkerhoff later commented on PBS that, "The United States itself is now for the first time since the War of 1812 a theater of war. That means that we should apply, in my view, the same kind of command structure in the United States that we apply in other theaters of war."
Then in response to Hurricane Katrina in Sept. 2005, according to the Washington Post, White House senior adviser Karl Rove told the governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Babineaux Blanco, that she should explore legal options to impose martial law "or as close as we can get." The White House tried vigorously, but ultimately failed, to compel Gov. Blanco to yield control of the state National Guard.
Also in September, NORTHCOM conducted its highly classified Granite Shadow exercise in Washington. As William Arkin reported in the Washington Post, "Granite Shadow is yet another new Top Secret and compartmented operation related to the military's extra-legal powers regarding weapons of mass destruction. It allows for emergency military operations in the United States without civilian supervision or control."
It is clear that the Bush administration is thinking seriously about martial law.
Many critics have alleged that FEMA's spectacular failure to respond to Katrina followed from a deliberate White House policy: of paring back FEMA, and instead strengthening the military for responses to disasters.
A multimillion program for detention facilities will greatly increase NORTHCOM's ability to respond to any domestic disorders.
Scott is author of "Drugs, Oil, and War: The United States in Afghanistan, Colombia, and Indochina" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003). He is completing a book on "The Road to 9/11." Visit his Web site .
http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_a ... 3f4c9b3a77 (http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77)
I wouldn't listen too much to what Vladimir Zhirinovsky says.
But an attack on Iran is of course still possible. ;)
I don't know anything about Vladimir Zhirinovsky. Why do you say that?
Quote from: "spark"The possible inorganic manufactured nature of the riots has to be seriously considered. The three most offensive cartoons that caused the outrage were not even printed in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper but were added in and handed out by Danish imams who “circulated the images to brethren in Muslim countries,†according to the London Telegraph.
It also appears highly suspicious that Muslims in Gaza City and other places had gained access to a plentiful supply of Danish flags to burn in front of the waiting world media as soon as the controversy broke out.
It now comes to light that Merete Eldrup, managing director of JP/Politikens Hus, the company that published the cartoons, is the wife of Anders Eldrup. Anders Eldrup is a Bilderberg member who has attended the last five Bilderberg meetings. The Bilderberg Group is a shadowy organization that meets once a year to steer global policy. It is now widely acknowledged that Bilderberg set the date for the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.
yah ole, who is that guy? is he in any way reliable? the above quote sounds all too much like the US gov't's manners of 'persuasion'...
i want those outside the US to know that the Resistance in the US is doing all it can to oppose what is happening...it's slow...we can't do what they do or become them, we have to turn to the Constitution and rule of law over and over where they would simply sneer, talk of Jesus, wave a flag, then laugh at the yokels who support them when the door is shut...people here are angry, very angry, at what is going on...much hope is pinned on the Congressional elections in November 06...if the King's Men are tossed to the curb by the voters, this nightmare begins to unravel...it's happening already but not fucking fast enough for anyone here...
QuoteSome critics say that Zhirinovsky's party has very little in common with what Westerners call liberalism.
He advocates alliances between the former Soviet republics leading up to re-incorporation of the Soviet Union. Zhirinovsky also made statements regarding re-acquisition of Alaska through the use of military force, invading and occupying Iran, and constructing large fans to blow Russia's nuclear waste into Germany. He has also praised Adolf Hitler's rule and encouraged the use of nuclear weapons against possible adversaries. He has been known to make public anti-Semitic remarks.
This is from Wikipedia. Zhirinovsky is some kind of russian ultra-nationalist ,who talked about invading Finland if he ever came to power in Russia. He made a pretty freaky impression on me.
His party was gaining popularity just after the Soviet union collapsed, but since then I haven't heard much about him.
//http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Zhirinovsky
Quote from: "cenacle"yah ole, who is that guy? is he in any way reliable? the above quote sounds all too much like the US gov't's manners of 'persuasion'...
i want those outside the US to know that the Resistance in the US is doing all it can to oppose what is happening...it's slow...we can't do what they do or become them, we have to turn to the Constitution and rule of law over and over where they would simply sneer, talk of Jesus, wave a flag, then laugh at the yokels who support them when the door is shut...people here are angry, very angry, at what is going on...much hope is pinned on the Congressional elections in November 06...if the King's Men are tossed to the curb by the voters, this nightmare begins to unravel...it's happening already but not fucking fast enough for anyone here...
at least you guys are a lot more active than australia.
Quote from: "Ole Sok"QuoteSome critics say that Zhirinovsky's party has very little in common with what Westerners call liberalism.
He advocates alliances between the former Soviet republics leading up to re-incorporation of the Soviet Union. Zhirinovsky also made statements regarding re-acquisition of Alaska through the use of military force, invading and occupying Iran, and constructing large fans to blow Russia's nuclear waste into Germany. He has also praised Adolf Hitler's rule and encouraged the use of nuclear weapons against possible adversaries. He has been known to make public anti-Semitic remarks.
This is from Wikipedia. Zhirinovsky is some kind of russian ultra-nationalist ,who talked about invading Finland if he ever came to power in Russia. He made a pretty freaky impression on me.
His party was gaining popularity just after the Soviet union collapsed, but since then I haven't heard much about him.
//http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Zhirinovsky
as me. :shock: all of this doesn't mean that he's bullshitting though.
the Project for the New American Century papers-- http://www.newamericancentury.org/state ... ciples.htm (http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm) --prove that the Bush* cabal WANTS to invade Iran, wants to bring all of them 'A-rab, heretics, non-caucasian, unbelievers' to their knees...the problem is that the Bush* cabal has no military knowledge, no understanding of the world, no empathy for the daily lives people in other nations possess and will not gladly have ripped from them by foreign occupiers...they possess the most powerful military arsenal in the world and yet do not listen to the generals who would tell them how to operate it most efficiently...they have countless people on their payroll who know the Middle Eastern countries better than they do, and would be willing to help them work out a version of democratic government they might actually want...they have membership in the United Nations which, if those ruling the would-be AmeriKKKan Empire had any interest in being a valid, leading, visionary part of the world community, would put the resources of the globe to hand to aid in any cause...the Bush* cabal chooses to go it alone, to try and overlord the planet, listen to none but their own...it's not working...
i think Iran is a danger, surely, but just as much are the November 06 US congressional elections...will the votes be counted and, if they go against the Bush* cabal, will they allow them to stand? nobody knows...the Constitution stands in crisis, and with it the fates of millions of people...
if this sounds dramatic, it is...if it sounds scary, it is...if it sounds exaggerated, i'm afraid it isn't...